![]() |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
I first want to thank Rick Goosney, P.Eng. and his volunteer National Engineering and Geoscience Week (NEGW) Committee members:
for their tremendous efforts in organizing another full slate of events for NEGW. There is a significant effort involved in co-ordinating activities for this week which is very much appreciated as it is the most significant outreach activity undertaken by PEG annually. An article describing this year's activities is included in this issue of Dialogue. Since the last issue of this Newsletter, our new Council has identified three focus areas for the current Council year:
Professional Development (PD) Program Review Our new PD program was introduced in January, with a more qualitative focus than its predecessor. While satisfying the original program's objectives, it was anticipated that this new program would be more attractive to members and easier to administer. In fact, the opposite happened. The new program has met with increased member objection and a larger than usual number of members were removed from the register because of non-compliance with the program. There was also a significant increase in time required to administer the program. Based on this experience, Council has slightly reduced the program's reporting requirements for 2006 and formed a Task Group to review PEG's approach to PD. Their mandate is to recommend a future direction for the PD Program to Council by mid-2006. We await the Task Group's advice. There will be more on this topic in future Dialogue articles. It is, however, fair to say that mandatory Professional Development is here to stay for practicing members, we just need to identify a program that is most effective for all stakeholders, recognizing that no program will please everyone. Membership Engagement Membership Engagement is an area in which I have great interest. Historically, it has been an area of great challenge for our organization. PEG consists of 2510 members, with approximately 7% being Geoscientists and 14% being GITs or EITs. We are a somewhat diverse group and face a number of challenges in our efforts to make members feel a strong sense of engagement with PEG. In any case, Council has adopted the following objectives with respect to this issue:
We propose to pursue these objectives by:
We currently have many active members who volunteer their time on numerous PEG committees. I thank each and every one of these people for their contribution. However, there is always turnover and we welcome new people with fresh ideas. I personally invite those members, particularly new or otherwise less engaged members, to seek opportunities to become more engaged in the business and/or social aspects of PEG. Feel free to contact me at president@pegnl.ca or Steve Mclean at the PEG office 709.753.7714 if you wish to get more involved - or just show up at a PEG event. External Linkage Plan While a formal external engagement plan is still under development, we remain very active in this area. A partial list includes:
We remain very active across a broad front in "linking" with many external stakeholders. A sample of recent activities includes:
With such a vast and diverse list of external stakeholders, it is not possible to reach every one in any one year, hence the need for a plan which we are developing to ensure we focus on our highest priorities. As always, I welcome your feedback or suggestions on any of the topics covered in this article president@pegnl.ca © Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Newfoundland and Labrador |
|
|||||||||||||